Checklist for Discovery Conference TTAB Proceeding (inter partes) adapted from TBMP 401.01 Discovery Conferences (June 2018) and from Miscellaneous Changes to Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Rules 81 Fed. Reg. 69950 (October 7, 2016), Summary by Rule Number "The parties are required to schedule and hold a discovery conference by the deadline in the schedule in this order, or as reset by the Board. In the conference, the parties are required to discuss, at a minimum [1- |
||
[ ] 1) |
the nature and basis of their claims and defenses, |
Required |
[ ] 2) |
the possibility of promptly settling, or at least narrowing the scope of claims or defenses, and |
Required |
[ ] 3) |
arrangements for disclosures, discovery, preserving discoverable information and introduction of evidence at trial. |
Required |
[ ] 4) |
Optional: Additional topics that could promote settlement or efficient adjudication of the Board proceeding including alternative means for adjudication such as the Board’s Accelerated Case Resolution (ACR) procedure. |
|
[ ] 5) |
Optional: stipulations altering disclosure obligations. Reciprocal obligations and progress made in satisfying such obligations should be discussed even after the discovery conference has been held. |
|
|
|
|
|
Other Optional Subject(s) Changes to Procedure in Inter Partes Proceedings Effective January 14, 2017 for all cases (including cases pending prior to 1/14/17) |
Section location of rule changes |
[ ] 6) |
Stipulations to reschedule pretrial disclosure and trial dates must be filed through ESTTA with the relevant dates set forth and an express statement that all parties agree to the new dates. |
2.121(d) |
[ ] 7) |
Standard protective order is automatically imposed in inter partes proceedings. |
2.116(e) and (g) |
[ ] 8) |
All submissions and papers in inter partes cases, except for notices of opposition or petitions to cancel must be served by email unless otherwise stipulated. If not possible because of technical problems or extraordinary circumstances and there is no stipulation, serving party must show by written explanation accompanying the submission or paper that email service was attempted but could not be made. |
2.119(a) and (b) |
[ ] 9) |
All response dates initiated by a service date are twenty days. |
2.119(c) |
[ ]10) |
Proportionality in process and procedure in discovery. |
2.120(a)(1) |
[ ]11) |
All discovery requests must be served early enough in the discovery period so that responses will be due no later than the close of discovery. |
2.120(a)(3) |
[ ]12) |
The total number of interrogatories which a party may serve on another party, in a proceeding, may not exceed 75, counting subparts, except that the Board may allow additional interrogatories on motion therefor showing good cause, or on stipulation of the parties. See TBMP § 519. Parties may also stipulate that the limit on interrogatories shall be fewer than 75. |
2.120(d) |
[ ]13) |
Requests for production are limited to 75 with the option to move for additional requests upon a showing of good cause. If party believes requests exceed allowed number, the party shall serve a general objection as to excessive number. Clarifies that discoverable items include electronically stored information as well as documents and tangible things. |
2.120(e) |
[ ]14) |
Clarifies that discoverable items include electronically stored information as well as documents and tangible things. |
2.120(f)(1) and (2) |
[ ]15) |
Requests for admission are limited to 75 with the option to move for additional requests upon a showing of good cause. If party believes requests exceed allowed number, the party shall serve a general objection as to excessive number. Party may make one comprehensive request for admission for authenticating specific documents produced by an adverse party or specifying which of those documents cannot be authenticated. |
2.120(i) |
[ ]16) |
In addition to being extended, testimony periods may be shortened. When a motion to extend the testimony period is denied, associated pretrial disclosure deadlines may remain as set. |
2.121(c) |
|
|
|
|
Add your own items to the discovery conference checklist below: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NoticeOfOpposition.com
Only 3% of applications are opposed.
See what other facts are important to know!
TMk®
Not Just Patents®
Aim Higher® Facts Matter
W@TMK.law best or
1-
(Calls are screened for ‘trademark’ and other applicable reasons for the call)
TMk® Email W@TMK.law best or call 1- For more information from Not Just Patents, see our other pages and sites: |
|
Are You a Content Provider- |
|
Trademark Register FAQ Definition: Clearance Search teas plus vs teas standard approved for pub - |
Amend to Supplemental Register? |
|
|
ID of Goods and Services see also Headings (list) of International Trademark Classes How to search ID Manual |
How to TESS trademark search- |
Likelihood of confusion- |
|
Published for Opposition What is Discoverable in a TTAB Proceeding Affirmative Defenses |
|
What is the Difference between Principal & Supplemental Register? |
What is a Family of Marks? What If Someone Files An Opposition Against My Trademark? Statutory Cause of Action (aka Standing) |
©2008- Email: W@TMK.law. This site is for informational purposes only and is provided without warranties, express or implied, regarding the information's accuracy, timeliness, or completeness and does not constitute legal advice. No attorney/client relationship exists without a written contract between Not Just Patents LLC and its client. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Privacy Policy Contact Us
|